sw19stag wrote:What a sad world we live in where the use of a 'word' [whatever that may be] can result in a court case.
Meanwhile crime escalates and raspberry continue to do exactly as they like.
Maybe they don't offend the 'easily offended' brigade.
sw19stag wrote:I must say I agree with them.
sw19stag wrote:What a sad world we live in where the use of a 'word' [whatever that may be] can result in a court case.
Meanwhile crime escalates and raspberry continue to do exactly as they like.
Maybe they don't offend the 'easily offended' brigade.
sw19stag wrote:'Hate Speech' ??
Nebulous crap. What is it supposed to mean?
Don't be brainwashed by this.
It's an example of totalitarianism, pure and simple.
Don't be told what to say, or do.
Stagsnet deserves better.
sw19stag wrote:Maybe after the match report on Saturday!
sw19stag wrote:'Hate Speech' ??
Nebulous crap. What is it supposed to mean?
Don't be brainwashed by this.
It's an example of totalitarianism, pure and simple.
Don't be told what to say, or do.
Stagsnet deserves better.
Hate speech is typically directed towards another person or group on the grounds of race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, colour, ethnic origin and religion. Hate speech can be shown in many forms, typically verbal abuse, written speeches, harassment or gestures. The intention of hate speech is to harass and distress the intended target. In many cases the use of hate speech can incite violence from one group towards another.
sw19stag wrote:Thanks for the banter chaps,
see you on Sat.
C'mon you Stags boysaahhhh!
sw19stag wrote:I must say I agree with them.
lou c wrote:Instead of "reading the drivel on the Owls board" you might want to read the proceedings from the first hearing?
It clearly states it was one mans word against another, nobody else heard anything, and KP had his back to FF when he heard or thought he heard the N word. They shook hands in the dressing room afterwards.
also the FA never said FF "was a racist" just they believed he said something "in the heat of the moment" and he has never been in trouble for racially abusing a player previously. he fully admitted calling KP "Cock-Face" though
Also look at the names on the panel and research what they do for a living and judge how "Independent" they are in this case.
http://www.thefa.com/-/media/files/thef ... -2019.ashx
lou c wrote:No I said research what they do for a living i.e what they get paid for doing. One is employed by Kick It Out and the other is a barrister specialising in "anti discrimination" cases.
By the way "names of african origin"
Hahahahaahaha
lou c wrote:So 2 people who make money out of the "anti racism" industry are unbiased to sit on a panel judging someone of being racist? Of course they are lol
by the way:
population of UK who identify as Black = 3%
population of FA panel who are black = 66%
One black mans word against a white mans word and the 66% anti racist black activist panel found the white man guilty. What a surprise!
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: awalkinthepark, Cleveland_Stag, Frankenstag, IAmTheStag, MTFCMusings, naanbread2, Nutty Stag, Stags Head Stags and 151 guests