arsene wengers coat wrote:Best thing for the game is to get rid of them. Loads of teams have started again. AFC Wimbledon did... Look how well they're run now.
Jamie wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Best thing for the game is to get rid of them. Loads of teams have started again. AFC Wimbledon did... Look how well they're run now.
I agree both should now be removed from the FL, assuming nothing crazy happens this afternoon.
Just on the AFC Wimbledon, that was very different. They started a new club from scratch way down the chain, while the club in question renamed itself and moved, so not really the same. There are other examples of teams that went 'bust' and have started to work there way back up.
Sad for the fans of both clubs, but part of me also thinks fans should do more and take more action to ensure their clubs are being run correctly or sold to legitimate people.
As i said in another post, the sooner the FA / EFL do something to stop this from keep happening, the better. It can't be right that people can take on clubs with huge debts and not show any means to clear them or run the club. It can't also be right that owners can use football clubs as a way to move money around and avoid tax. If you want to bankroll a club, do it properly via sponsorship or gifting the money.
The future for EFL clubs without a wealthy owner is surely fans ownership. Its a shame that isn't possible in these cases.
arsene wengers coat wrote:Not surprisingly, the interested party won't sign an agreement when they don't know what they're signing for...
Omni-shambles.
As harsh as it is, this limbo makes the EFL look totally dysfunctional and inept.
Either eject them both, or release a statement saying they're going to sort them out. This limbo is really bad for the game. I understand that if the EFL do help sort out bury and Bolton they set a very dangerous precedent for other clubs and owners who play by the rules who may now look to push the boat out knowing there is no punishment for not playing by the rules.
Best thing for the game is to get rid of them. Loads of teams have started again. AFC Wimbledon did... Look how well they're run now.
Jamie wrote:Andy, i agree its easy to say stuff with hindsight, but the EFL / FA have seen this happen time and time again and do nothing to really stop it from happening. Football clubs aren't just like any normal business, they are the heart of towns / citys and play a big part in local communities and economies, they need protecting better than they are now.
I really can't be arsed with a long Haslam argument again, but i will say that was different... He profited from our club, and during hard times we did have a period where players weren't paid for a while but that was cleared up. He didn't rack up massive debts or run the club beyond its means, he didn't cripple the club financially (although his questionable actions started to lead to that when fans withdrew support / money), he was just a money grabber who held us back through his own greed. The situation with the other clubs here is very different, they've spent money they didn't have, borrowed beyond there means and have no right to continue unless someone comes in with a big cheque to save them.
Fans should have that power where a sale is concerned. The FA / EFL should get fans to ratify a sale or at least the ability to raise objections. Fans often know more about certain people who want to be involved and if there were enough objections that could at least trigger a far deeper check than the normal one. There is loads of stuff they could do to help keep clubs safe from idiots like those mentioned, but they seemingly do naff all.
Old timer wrote:Phil Neville makes me angry too. He and his fellow Prem and ex Prem players are happy to take £millions for themselves out of the game but when Bury go to the wall he's one of the first to say what a terrible situation it is. Maybe if the top footballers weren't so greedy on the obscene amount of money they want to do their job then that greed wouldn't have trickled down to the lower leagues and helped to make clubs unsubstainable.
Old timer wrote:Phil Neville makes me angry too. He and his fellow Prem and ex Prem players are happy to take £millions for themselves out of the game but when Bury go to the wall he's one of the first to say what a terrible situation it is. Maybe if the top footballers weren't so greedy on the obscene amount of money they want to do their job then that greed wouldn't have trickled down to the lower leagues and helped to make clubs unsubstainable.
arsene wengers coat wrote:I suppose the question now begs; should we try to sign Stephen Dawson?
arsene wengers coat wrote:Old timer wrote:Phil Neville makes me angry too. He and his fellow Prem and ex Prem players are happy to take £millions for themselves out of the game but when Bury go to the wall he's one of the first to say what a terrible situation it is. Maybe if the top footballers weren't so greedy on the obscene amount of money they want to do their job then that greed wouldn't have trickled down to the lower leagues and helped to make clubs unsubstainable.
It's not their fault their were offered good contracts.
Old timer wrote:Phil Neville makes me angry too. He and his fellow Prem and ex Prem players are happy to take £millions for themselves out of the game but when Bury go to the wall he's one of the first to say what a terrible situation it is. Maybe if the top footballers weren't so greedy on the obscene amount of money they want to do their job then that greed wouldn't have trickled down to the lower leagues and helped to make clubs unsubstainable.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Cardiffstag23, Frankenstag, groundhoppingstag, marker_mtfc95, Martin Shaw, Newhall1, PEAR CIDER and 180 guests