MTFCMAD wrote:Draw was fair result.... But that second half display looked like a team who'd ran out of ideas with us only having walker up top and cj doing his best impersonation of a statue second half.
stagsfan6493 wrote:MTFCMAD wrote:Draw was fair result.... But that second half display looked like a team who'd ran out of ideas with us only having walker up top and cj doing his best impersonation of a statue second half.
That’s because Grant creates things, when we took him off we created nothing. Mellis should have been sacarficed for a more defensive minded player IMO.
SINA STAG wrote:CJ pushed off the ball doesn't like to tackle n scared to be tackled waste of a shirt once again in front of a big crowd.
Dont keepers do their homework on penalty takers everytime he strolls up n taps it down the middle.....
Thrown away 2 points because of Logan being lazy
ParisStag wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:MTFCMAD wrote:Draw was fair result.... But that second half display looked like a team who'd ran out of ideas with us only having walker up top and cj doing his best impersonation of a statue second half.
That’s because Grant creates things, when we took him off we created nothing. Mellis should have been sacarficed for a more defensive minded player IMO.
It didn't suit the strategy at the time though. Our defence had handled everything comfortably all game so Flicker was justified in trying to hold out for the win. We needed midfielders who could defend higher up the pitch and be disciplined in keeping shape, so Macca came on for Grant. I won't blame the manager for that.
stagsfan6493 wrote:ParisStag wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:MTFCMAD wrote:Draw was fair result.... But that second half display looked like a team who'd ran out of ideas with us only having walker up top and cj doing his best impersonation of a statue second half.
That’s because Grant creates things, when we took him off we created nothing. Mellis should have been sacarficed for a more defensive minded player IMO.
It didn't suit the strategy at the time though. Our defence had handled everything comfortably all game so Flicker was justified in trying to hold out for the win. We needed midfielders who could defend higher up the pitch and be disciplined in keeping shape, so Macca came on for Grant. I won't blame the manager for that.
I’m not blaming the manager, I completely understand why he did it.
Someone said we ran out of ideas second half, which we did as we lost our creative attacking mid.
MTFCMusings wrote:Logan will keep costing us as I’ve said countless times, same as the reverse fixture last year. Flitcroft is to blame as well for dropping Smith who has barely put a foot wrong. Don’t forget the fumble in the six yard box under zero pressure which could easily have cost us prior to the penalty.
ParisStag wrote:SINA STAG wrote:CJ pushed off the ball doesn't like to tackle n scared to be tackled waste of a shirt once again in front of a big crowd.
Dont keepers do their homework on penalty takers everytime he strolls up n taps it down the middle.....
Thrown away 2 points because of Logan being lazy
Was Benning's fault. He could have either put it behind for a corner, hooked it for a throw or seen it out for a goal kick, but he just stood there gesturing to Logsn to come get it when it wasn't his to get. Logan had no choice but to come when he saw the Lincoln player nipping in. Benning stitched him up.
Amber Andy wrote:Typical Stagsnet always got to blame someone for a disappointing result. Yes it was a bad error, but he did some good things too. Also the ball should have been cleared before it got to Logan.
What about our toothless attack. How many shots did we have on target?
Sneag wrote:ParisStag wrote:SINA STAG wrote:CJ pushed off the ball doesn't like to tackle n scared to be tackled waste of a shirt once again in front of a big crowd.
Dont keepers do their homework on penalty takers everytime he strolls up n taps it down the middle.....
Thrown away 2 points because of Logan being lazy
Was Benning's fault. He could have either put it behind for a corner, hooked it for a throw or seen it out for a goal kick, but he just stood there gesturing to Logsn to come get it when it wasn't his to get. Logan had no choice but to come when he saw the Lincoln player nipping in. Benning stitched him up.
That was 100% Logan's fault, Bobby or Smith would have been out a hell of a lot quicker and made a routine interception. Benning shouldn't have had any kind of decision to make. If we keep Logan in nets you can forget a top 3 finish. He gifted them a goal and nearly gave them two.
Amber Andy wrote:Typical Stagsnet always got to blame someone for a disappointing result. Yes it was a bad error, but he did some good things too. Also the ball should have been cleared before it got to Logan.
What about our toothless attack. How many shots did we have on target?
Amber Andy wrote:Typical Stagsnet always got to blame someone for a disappointing result. Yes it was a bad error, but he did some good things too. Also the ball should have been cleared before it got to Logan.
What about our toothless attack. How many shots did we have on target?
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: arsene wengers coat, Bradders, Conker, dublin_stag, MTFCMusings, Stagman44, zod and 325 guests