Woodclanger 1 wrote:Conker wrote:Weird to win 4-0, should have been 6 but still finding it hard to find confidence for the season ahead.
If was a poor first half except for the individual brilliance (and shocking defending) second half we improved and deserved the 4-0 finish.
Northampton were abysmal though, they gave up in that second half. We need to get two wins on the bounce now.
Surely no coincidence that once he went to a flat back four, took poor again Walker off and moved CJ further forward???
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:An increase of 9% isn't a noteable swing?
Jamie wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:An increase of 9% isn't a noteable swing?
You said wild. I said wild...
Wild, no... Notable yes.
MTFCMusings wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:Conker wrote:Weird to win 4-0, should have been 6 but still finding it hard to find confidence for the season ahead.
If was a poor first half except for the individual brilliance (and shocking defending) second half we improved and deserved the 4-0 finish.
Northampton were abysmal though, they gave up in that second half. We need to get two wins on the bounce now.
Surely no coincidence that once he went to a flat back four, took poor again Walker off and moved CJ further forward???
Haha! This explains a lot. Are you sure you watch the games Woody?
Woodclanger 1 wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:Conker wrote:Weird to win 4-0, should have been 6 but still finding it hard to find confidence for the season ahead.
If was a poor first half except for the individual brilliance (and shocking defending) second half we improved and deserved the 4-0 finish.
Northampton were abysmal though, they gave up in that second half. We need to get two wins on the bounce now.
Surely no coincidence that once he went to a flat back four, took poor again Walker off and moved CJ further forward???
Haha! This explains a lot. Are you sure you watch the games Woody?
Certainly do for far too many years, I do watch from pitch level though and it looked like a back four and that was the general consensus in the Sandy afterwards, if it wasnt then I take it back, it's not hard to admit you are wrong, you should try it sometimes
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:It's not a different opinion fans struggle with, it's the constant whiney negativity in every post
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:It's not a different opinion fans struggle with, it's the constant whiney negativity in every post
abc wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:It's not a different opinion fans struggle with, it's the constant whiney negativity in every post
So those of us that are not in the happy clapper brigade aren't real fans ? Just because some are't getting carried away by one decent win doesn't mean they are negative, more realistic. As I have said in a previous post I really hope Flipflop proves us doubters wrong. If some wanted us to lose games just to be rid of Flipflop then that would be negative and I for one don't agree with that.
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:abc wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:It's not a different opinion fans struggle with, it's the constant whiney negativity in every post
So those of us that are not in the happy clapper brigade aren't real fans ? Just because some are't getting carried away by one decent win doesn't mean they are negative, more realistic. As I have said in a previous post I really hope Flipflop proves us doubters wrong. If some wanted us to lose games just to be rid of Flipflop then that would be negative and I for one don't agree with that.
Wow, you've made more hops/skips & jumps in your assumptions to put Jonathan Edwards to shame
Where did I accuse anyone of not being a fan? Clearly something to I hide there I reckon!!
Some fans seem to feast on defeat, not necessarily for enjoyment or to wallow in misery. They selectively filter out aspects to suit their agenda rather than the whole picture, rarely looking as to 'why' and concentrating on the 'what', as its easier to feed their propaganda. Often posts lack balance, refuse to consider one supposition opposed to another, and can hijack unrelated threads to steer back to their subject.
Stagsnet is littered with these posts over its history. As I'm told so many times : the facts don't lie!
That's their opinion though and up to them as a 'realist'
Jamie wrote:Even three more wins on the bounce only takes it to 33.3%, and following a 4 game win streak. Hardly a wild swing or an impressive figure.
Woodclanger 1 wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:Conker wrote:Weird to win 4-0, should have been 6 but still finding it hard to find confidence for the season ahead.
If was a poor first half except for the individual brilliance (and shocking defending) second half we improved and deserved the 4-0 finish.
Northampton were abysmal though, they gave up in that second half. We need to get two wins on the bounce now.
Surely no coincidence that once he went to a flat back four, took poor again Walker off and moved CJ further forward???
Haha! This explains a lot. Are you sure you watch the games Woody?
Certainly do for far too many years, I do watch from pitch level though and it looked like a back four and that was the general consensus in the Sandy afterwards, if it wasnt then I take it back, it's not hard to admit you are wrong, you should try it sometimes
Martin Shaw wrote:
Martin Shaw wrote:
MTFCMusings wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:Conker wrote:Weird to win 4-0, should have been 6 but still finding it hard to find confidence for the season ahead.
If was a poor first half except for the individual brilliance (and shocking defending) second half we improved and deserved the 4-0 finish.
Northampton were abysmal though, they gave up in that second half. We need to get two wins on the bounce now.
Surely no coincidence that once he went to a flat back four, took poor again Walker off and moved CJ further forward???
Haha! This explains a lot. Are you sure you watch the games Woody?
Certainly do for far too many years, I do watch from pitch level though and it looked like a back four and that was the general consensus in the Sandy afterwards, if it wasnt then I take it back, it's not hard to admit you are wrong, you should try it sometimes
When it happens I'll give you a shout
Until then it was indeed the same formation in terms of wing backs, with Atkinson slotting in nicely in a position you have previously said he could not play and CJ exploited the space in behind as Northampton attempted (awfully) to get back into the game.
MTFCMusings wrote:You said he was too slow to play wide right.
MTFCMusings wrote:It's not in this thread, so I can't, it was something you said a while ago. Check your past posts and you will find it.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: bobbystagsfan, Chrisuknottm, mattstag14, Scothie the Stag, Sneag and 164 guests