Jamie wrote:7 for CJ is generous, especially if Byrom is only worth a 6.
MTFCMusings wrote:CJ was poor. Apart from the incident where he was taken out, the right back had him in his back pocket. I thought Byrom was really rood, perhaps the best I have personally seen him play.
kevin kents tasce wrote:Amber Andy wrote:I fail to see the argument.It was two pieces of brilliance by a player above league 2 level. But for some on here they have to find someone to blame.
It was a good delivery, no doubt. I wouldn't go so far as brilliant though. (The second goal was brilliant)
A league standard goalkeeper should deal with that cross. The reason it looks so high is because he effectively walked under the ball - because he didn't read the flight.
Its not Shearers fault we lost yesterday - but he could have done better with the first goal.
Martin Shaw wrote:showaddywaddy, have you seen the two images on page 1 of this thread? It was well above the level of the bar. He had no chance.
Martin Shaw wrote:showaddywaddy, have you seen the two images on page 1 of this thread? It was well above the level of the bar. He had no chance.
Jamie wrote:7 for CJ is generous, especially if Byrom is only worth a 6.
Warsop Stag wrote:Jamie wrote:7 for CJ is generous, especially if Byrom is only worth a 6.
All about opinions of course, but I scored CJ a 5 and Byrom an 8 and MoM!
Martin Shaw wrote:showaddywaddy, have you seen the two images on page 1 of this thread? It was well above the level of the bar. He had no chance.
BELSE wrote:never tell martin shaw he is wrong or will take you of site
Martin Shaw wrote:BELSE wrote:never tell martin shaw he is wrong or will take you of site
wow, what an insulting comment. I have never done that. Nor would I. And comments like that make me wonder why I bother running it.
Really? I doubt that very much. Mind you, with comments like that I wouldn't blame him.BELSE wrote:never tell martin shaw he is wrong or will take you of site
EdwinstoweStag wrote:And I didn't think Byrom was worth more than a 6 !
Just goes to show that we all see things individually.
Rob wrote:EdwinstoweStag wrote:And I didn't think Byrom was worth more than a 6 !
Just goes to show that we all see things individually.
Yeah, me and Warsop are right, you're wrong
Martin Shaw wrote:in case you haven't spotted it BELSE, I have people telling me I'm wrong every single match, every single week, and have done so since my first report in 1998, nearly 20 years ago.
It's the nature of taking time to construct a report and an opinion, ... others will disagree with that opinion. Your comment is up there with some of the most insulting in that time.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests