Chander Lear wrote:You lot expect too much
Not lost in 9 NINE league games
Why would any one want to play fo stags when our fans boo a draw
Absolutely disgusting
Want to romp the league?? Start backing
stagsfan6493 wrote:Chander Lear wrote:You lot expect too much
Not lost in 9 NINE league games
Why would any one want to play fo stags when our fans boo a draw
Absolutely disgusting
Want to romp the league?? Start backing
We were terrible today, maybe if you went to a game you’d actually realise!
wardy12345 wrote:EdwinstoweStag wrote:wardy12345 wrote:After today’s performance bang average is a compliment.
Substitutions were woeful and back fired making a poor side look worse.
Many of the players didn’t look interested. Walker didn’t really do anything.
Looks like a relegation battle if flop stays
Shut up you buffoon
I bet you wouldn’t say that to my face. You are very brave hideing behind your key board being the big brave troll
wardy12345 wrote:EdwinstoweStag wrote:wardy12345 wrote:After today’s performance bang average is a compliment.
Substitutions were woeful and back fired making a poor side look worse.
Many of the players didn’t look interested. Walker didn’t really do anything.
Looks like a relegation battle if flop stays
Shut up you buffoon
I bet you wouldn’t say that to my face. You are very brave hideing behind your key board being the big brave troll
nharrison1010 wrote:...... and Stagnet reverts to its good old ways. Gets really annoying all the playground antics. Please, let’s just have a discussion rather than the boring ‘my dads bigger than your dad’ and ‘my keyboard is mightier than yours’ etc etc. This is league 2. Things are going to go wrong. Yes, we will be bang average a lot of the time, it’s the nature of this level of football. A couple of years ago lots of us would have been embarrassed to describe what we were playing as ‘football’. We are trying to play modern football, and in time I really think that it will click. Even Pep with the millions of £s at his disposal didn’t get it flowing straight away (not that I’m thinking we we will start playing the game as beautifully as Man Ciry do)
Forget last season, it's gone. Judge on results this season.abc wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:Chander Lear wrote:You lot expect too much
Not lost in 9 NINE league games
Why would any one want to play fo stags when our fans boo a draw
Absolutely disgusting
Want to romp the league?? Start backing
We were terrible today, maybe if you went to a game you’d actually realise!
He's obviously happy with Flopflops wonderful record of 3 wins in SEVENTEEN league games.
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote: hopelessly unfit after 70 mins,
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
Totally agree dude, and because its a forum we can discuss the areas where you're wrong
Those stats tell half the story bud - they don't show Evans had a similar record around the same period as DF's tenure. Nor do they show how for 40+ games we were just as clueless, no plan B, conceded daft goals, hopelessly unfit after 70 mins, played worse uncohesive stuff, bought some massively overpaid players (who were stuck with) that failed to show their worth. Stats ignore that DF's signings have been largely better IMO, we seem fitter, play better stuff, create more chances per game.
We gave Evans every chance and he EVENTUALLY showed his worth, but we won't give similar because DF isn't worth it apparently. And the reason for that it is bias my friend
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
Totally agree dude, and because its a forum we can discuss the areas where you're wrong
Those stats tell half the story bud - they don't show Evans had a similar record around the same period as DF's tenure. Nor do they show how for 40+ games we were just as clueless, no plan B, conceded daft goals, hopelessly unfit after 70 mins, played worse uncohesive stuff, bought some massively overpaid players (who were stuck with) that failed to show their worth. Stats ignore that DF's signings have been largely better IMO, we seem fitter, play better stuff, create more chances per game.
We gave Evans every chance and he EVENTUALLY showed his worth, but we won't give similar because DF isn't worth it apparently. And the reason for that it is bias my friend
Woodclanger 1 wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
Totally agree dude, and because its a forum we can discuss the areas where you're wrong
Those stats tell half the story bud - they don't show Evans had a similar record around the same period as DF's tenure. Nor do they show how for 40+ games we were just as clueless, no plan B, conceded daft goals, hopelessly unfit after 70 mins, played worse uncohesive stuff, bought some massively overpaid players (who were stuck with) that failed to show their worth. Stats ignore that DF's signings have been largely better IMO, we seem fitter, play better stuff, create more chances per game.
We gave Evans every chance and he EVENTUALLY showed his worth, but we won't give similar because DF isn't worth it apparently. And the reason for that it is bias my friend
You conveniently forgot the main points, 4th in the table and top of the form table.
Don't let your bias against Evans get in the way of facts.
Woodclanger 1 wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
Totally agree dude, and because its a forum we can discuss the areas where you're wrong
Those stats tell half the story bud - they don't show Evans had a similar record around the same period as DF's tenure. Nor do they show how for 40+ games we were just as clueless, no plan B, conceded daft goals, hopelessly unfit after 70 mins, played worse uncohesive stuff, bought some massively overpaid players (who were stuck with) that failed to show their worth. Stats ignore that DF's signings have been largely better IMO, we seem fitter, play better stuff, create more chances per game.
We gave Evans every chance and he EVENTUALLY showed his worth, but we won't give similar because DF isn't worth it apparently. And the reason for that it is bias my friend
You conveniently forgot the main points, 4th in the table and top of the form table.
Don't let your bias against Evans get in the way of facts.
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
Totally agree dude, and because its a forum we can discuss the areas where you're wrong
Those stats tell half the story bud - they don't show Evans had a similar record around the same period as DF's tenure. Nor do they show how for 40+ games we were just as clueless, no plan B, conceded daft goals, hopelessly unfit after 70 mins, played worse uncohesive stuff, bought some massively overpaid players (who were stuck with) that failed to show their worth. Stats ignore that DF's signings have been largely better IMO, we seem fitter, play better stuff, create more chances per game.
We gave Evans every chance and he EVENTUALLY showed his worth, but we won't give similar because DF isn't worth it apparently. And the reason for that it is bias my friend
MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:scotsstag wrote:MutinyOnTheCounty wrote:Somebody mentioned we are about the same points wise as '2 transfer windows' Evans was last season.
Difference is fans had faith then so prepared to wait, whereas several on here have no faith /actively dislike DF, so won't wait.
Put your bias to 1 side guys, and maybe quantify why SE got our backing, whereas DF doesn't deserve it....?
I'm not bias MOTC I just don't think he is either a good manager or that things will improve under his guidance.
At the Mill he has only a 22% win rate which includes last seasons debacle. SE the man everyone loves to hate had rate of 46%.
But hey, we're all fans and all have our own opinion, that's what makes a forum is it not?
Totally agree dude, and because its a forum we can discuss the areas where you're wrong
Those stats tell half the story bud - they don't show Evans had a similar record around the same period as DF's tenure. Nor do they show how for 40+ games we were just as clueless, no plan B, conceded daft goals, hopelessly unfit after 70 mins, played worse uncohesive stuff, bought some massively overpaid players (who were stuck with) that failed to show their worth. Stats ignore that DF's signings have been largely better IMO, we seem fitter, play better stuff, create more chances per game.
We gave Evans every chance and he EVENTUALLY showed his worth, but we won't give similar because DF isn't worth it apparently. And the reason for that it is bias my friend
You conveniently forgot the main points, 4th in the table and top of the form table.
Don't let your bias against Evans get in the way of facts.
I openly dislike Evans WC and make no secret of it, but supported him totally while he was here. If you want facts, perhaps look over the same 17 games between SE and DF - 51 points on offer, SE got us 21 whereas DF attained 19. Hardly a gulf in points returns, despite the fact Evans had twice as many games by then and 2 transfer windows.
Difference is, we gave Evans our full backing (and SE had greater financial freedom) because we believed he'd do the job. Because of this trust we were patient and gave him ample grace, but some don't think DF was/is up to the job we started calling for his head after 6(ish) games? Evans got us 4th / top form at the end of his tenure, much of it before was littered with draws & average performances.
I don't pretend DF is our saviour and will want him gone if he hasn't proved his worth after a fair time, but i'll give him a chance to first demonstrate this either way. Completely understand the frustration aspect though, just seems as though patience has taken leave of us and gone on R&R
Please point out the bias in my opinion if you think i'm unjust or unfair dude......
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: bacs, bobbystagsfan, Cardiffstag23, gazza1988, Martin Shaw, monarch of the glen, nickrobo60, OllertonStag, Richard Cranium, Roger_Sausage, Stagman44, wayno cordiniho and 146 guests