DoomMerchant wrote:I see absolutely nothing at all wrong with telling someone how good they look, assuming that it's done in the correct manner. She does use her looks as an asset and it works for her. She needs to look on it as an advantage in life, that's undoubtedly helped in getting her where she is - trust me, I speak as someone who has never had the privileges in the looks compartment
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Whilst I have some sympathy for this, unfortunately she can't have it both ways.
If she truly believes there should be no comments about her appearance, why does she go to such lengths and expense to accentuate her looks?.
Anyone who looks at her can immediately see that she has had cosmetic enhancements that she believes improves hers looks and uses them to her every advantage. Whilst accepting that is her absolute right she can hardly complain when people comment on it.
As they say though, any publicity is good publicity and once more Mrs Radford has pushed herself forward.
That said she has been very good for the club and long may it continue.
Chrisuknottm wrote:Carolyn is absolutely correct in that as a proven and successful business woman she should be treated with the respect that her business achievements warrant and not treated as some sort of unintelligent bimbo which she is categorically not. Just look at the fantastic job she has done for our club.
However lets broaden this out to comment on the fact that she says that professional mens football is dominated by men and why?
I for one am sick at tired at the disproportionate coverage given to womens football in particular and womens sport in general. If I want to watch it I will but dont try and market anything to me as something on a par or special because the point is its not. The standard in all 3 is akin to lower level mens non pro standards in all aspects. How can Sky give so much precedence to womens T20 cricket.....theres no one there.....when the "groundbreaking" Womens cricket world cup was on in 2017 they held the semi final at Derbyshire's County Ground...the semi final I point out.....and couldnt fill one of the smallest grounds in the country even with friends, family and multiple freebie tickets......how many womens football teams have folded because people dont go.....the same for rugby....why is everything on so late at night and BBC refuse to release viewing figures as they are commercially sensitive. Who has watched womens sport and lasted the whole game?
During last years 6 Nations Rugby and this summers World Cup both ITV and BBC trotted out so called eye candy panellists from the respective England Womens Teams. Fair enough if thats what gets ratings but where are their credentials at a comparitive level to warrant a place on those panels.....the reason you dont get male pundits from the Championship, League 1 and League 2 is that they havent played at the relevant level....everyone has the right to express an opinion but lets get it into perspective and panellists and pundits should be there based on their achievements at an appropriate level.
Womens sport is generally played at much lower level than the male counterparts but stop trying to sell it to the British Sporting public as something special or relevant when its not.
Carolyn Radford should be accorded the respect and courtesy to her as befits the amazing Chief Executive and Business Woman she is but mens professional football by its definition is completely different to womens sport and she should be judged on her ability as a business woman.
Foxy wrote:Let's not beat about the bush. She's only there because she's really pretty and incredibly wealthy in the first place.
I do like Carolyn but come on sweetcheeks you aren't a victim.
Everybody has to be a victim these days don't they? Except the only people who can't claim victimhood are white heterosexual men.
Feminism is another cancer on society.
Foxy wrote:You're going to argue she'd be there if she was bog standard average and skint?
No, thought not.
EdwinstoweStag wrote:So....
She needs to look more like Nora Batty?
Foxy wrote:Let's not beat about the bush. She's only there because she's really pretty and incredibly wealthy in the first place.
I do like Carolyn but come on sweetcheeks you aren't a victim.
Everybody has to be a victim these days don't they? Except the only people who can't claim victimhood are white heterosexual men.
Feminism is another cancer on society.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: northstandstag, Scothie the Stag, Stagnant, stagshead and 355 guests