Dan wrote:Kenwood wrote:Dan wrote:No photo shoot with the players wearing it?
More photos & video being released tomorrow
Why didn't we do it all at the same time?
tibby wrote:Men should be banned from having ill fitting shirts and especially names of boys more than half there age on the back
Dan wrote:I wouldn't pay any attention to the colour of the shirt or shorts on photos as they're never a true reflection of the real thing. Lots of reasons being you could have your screen brighter/lower on your tablet or pc, the photographer could edit the pics which could change the colour. Then the designers or press officers could then mess about by putting them on different backgrounds, jazz them up a bit etc which changes it again especially if their screen resolution is different. Some people are slightly colour blind and so on. Best seeing it in your own hands with your own eyes.
ParisStag wrote:If they just put out a proper Amber shirt with blue neck and an old fashioned badge that wasn't printed on and put it on sale at the end of May, they would sell thousands. Is it that hard to work out?
Sneag wrote:If they did a Chesterfield doormat I'd buy one.
It 110% needs amber socks at the very least when you see it like this.
I wonder if it may possibly cause colour clash problems away at Chesterfield?
Us having to play in our away kit at their place in the biggest derby of the season is just not right in my opinion.
STAGS FOR LIFE wrote:
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Admiral Sook, Bing [Bot], bob ledgers barber, bobbystagsfan, Clockworktarzan, Martin Shaw, MutinyOnTheCounty, OneManWentToMow, Stags 2002, sw19stag, wayno cordiniho, Woodclanger 1 and 45 guests